Critique of a research paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Critique of a research paper - Essay Example A clearly focused issue is similar to the research problem. Identifying a research problem is not always easy since every problem has compounding factors. Researchers, therefore, have to be keen when giving the exact problem being studied. This is why the researchers need a clear focus; a well-defined research question which can guide the research study. The clear focus eliminates frustration, confusion, wastage, and saves time (Blessing & Forister, 2013). In the report, a clear focus that would guide the research would be; â€Å"are nurse-led rheumatology clinics qualified for providing the same services offered by rheumatologist-led clinics?† The report is on a â€Å"Randomized controlled trial of a nurse-led rheumatology clinic for monitoring biological therapy† (Larsson et al., 2013, p. 164). The aim is to judge the nurse-led rheumatology clinic against rheumatologist-led clinic, in monitoring of biological therapy. It has focused on patients in remission or those w ith low disease activity, and are undergoing biological therapy. The main issue is that, there are nurse-led clinics that have previously been successful. In the UK, for example, some rheumatology nurse-led clinics showed a high level of effectiveness. It is due to such results that the researchers came up with the thought of a nurse-led intervention in Sweden. In Sweden, it is the rheumatologists who manage such clinics. Larsson and others assumed that there would be no significant differences in treatment consequences between the two interventions. . The results would provide evidence for practice and encourage the creation of nurse-led rheumatology clinics for the management of patients with stable chronic inflammatory arthritis, who are undergoing biological therapy. A clearly focused issue here is whether the nurse-led rheumatology clinics are suitable and qualified to manage patients. Randomized controlled trials are studies that make use of random assignment of study

3 Questions to case with EPA Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

3 Questions to case with EPA - Essay Example EPA had imposed a ban on any manufacture of coffee tables with a glass-top. The news on the ban of the coffee tables posed a threat to the business of Skywalker, a California resident whose main source of income came from the manufacture of coffee tables. Skywalker business was growing fast, but the news on the ban by EPA posed a threat to the booming business. The EPA regulations reached the target group through a short warning statement to the media houses and a comment on EPA website (Jennings 25). After the effective date for implementation of the new regulation regarding the ban, Skywalker could face an arrest and possible prosecution by EPA. After the regulation’s effective date, it is evident that Skywalker had already sold five such coffee tables already banned by EPA. According to the news received by the table mania business owner, Mr. Skywasker, the law took effect from 10 July. Therefore, it is with no reasonable doubts that his store contained the banned items. EPA could either charge, jail or impose sanctions to the violators of the law from its effective date (Jennings 31). Skywalker could face the law since the EPA had a mandate to propose and implement a law after approval by the Congress. According to the US federal government, any proposed regulation by a state agency, becomes law after the congress approves it. However, the complainant can challenge the regulation and avoid the punishment. EPA could face a challenge depending on the administrative authority of the state agencies. The acts by the state agencies have two categories, which are rulemaking depending on the nature of the rules, and adjudicative referring to the right of the accused to hearing (Jennings 240). Skywalker could challenge the EPA regulation on the ban of glass-coffee table in the US appeal court (Jennings 245). In this court, the complainant has a right to have his case listened to giving the facts as to why he thinks the regulation is